Alexander the Great & His Glorious Battles Research Paper

Alexander the salient & His Glorious Battles - question Paper Example... It was non the Macedonian Phalanx which penetrated to India, but Alexander. The terms like brilliant and mind truly represented the character of Alexander. According to Major General J.F.C. Fuller, only a genius binds the Great Captains into a common brotherhood. Alexanders strikingness could be seen in his genius through his visibility, physical and moral bravery, strength, aspirations to materialize the dreams he had, purposefulness, triumphs and accomplishments, which created a feeling of appreciation, reverence, safety and respect among his forces. ? Napoleon Bonaparte was a great admirer of Alexander the great. If one wants to learn the art of war, one should read time and once more the war initiatives of Alexander. Alexander was supreme on two fronts, head of the multitude and political head of the suppose of Macedonia and knew well that military pursuits were just the tools to achieve political ai m of long term peace. Alexander was great because he had the insight of using military might and political insight not to indulge in mass killing of enemy forces, a popular perspective of indulging in wars as affect upon by Clausewitz during the nineteenth century. Alexander pursued a cherished mission of winning the enemy not by looting enemy wealth to bereft the future victorious lands of all the necessary resources or earn the anger and wrath of the enemies unnecessarily. The primary mission of waging wars against foreign lands was to strategically win the confidence of the stack through political maneuvering.? The principles followed by Alexander helped in his winning adventures, which included respect for energy, attention, fast opposite time, sudden action, and cherishing the mission. Alexander had deep understanding of other strategically crucial war elements such as playing offensive tactics, using the military power economically, and setting up of safer bases, and risk-f ree communications. ? The glorious battles fought by Alexander attached the title of great to his name because he fought the battles by adhering to warfare principles, as stated above. He fought different warfare by following a line of thought in tip battles, sieges, small aggressions, insurgent war tactics, and revolts, making him distinct from other great commanders. Military commanders in his army were adapted in fighting a traditional war fought openly, they were not expert in the guerrilla warfare designs or circumventing the enemy base. Special about Alexanders battles was that he never wooly a battle during the 10 years war adventures initiated between 335 and 325 BC. He regularly led the warfare during his battles at least once a year, each year. His army was very well trained and blanket(a) of vigor combined-arms army, gifted to him by his father, to complete arduous tasks whatever the circumstances. Alexanders army was the uncommon army of that time. ? Alexander took good care of his soldiers. He never considered them like paid laborers but eer boosted their morale by setting an example of bravery before them through his individual power. He did not expect them to accomplish what he himself could not. He set an example of team-spirit in the army unit, and did not let any opportunity miss for the welfare of his soldiers. His humanistic attitude towards his comrades and appreciation of those in front of the unscathed unit who have set examples of