Should Cultural Anthropology Stop Trying to Model Itself as a Science Essay

Should Cultural Anthropology Stop Trying to Model Itself as a Science - Essay ExampleThis paper illustrates articles by two schools of imagination that seem to offer conflicting ideas on the question of cultural anthropology modeling itself as a acquisition. This is because humanities and sciences tend to appear as though they repugn for validity, as though, the two disciplines are two opposite extremes. In this regard, Geertz bears in mind that cultural anthropology is best done through interpretation, the humanities way, while Carneiro is of the absorb that studies should be done through studying the causes and effects. Carneiros way is the scientific method. According to the articles, Geertz opinion is that the humanisticic approach to cultural anthropology is the best. This is based on the dread that interpretation leads to definite contextual comprehension. In this regard, the application of scientific approaches puts to risk analysis of cultural aspects being incomplete. In addition, the issue of anthropology being a science gains popularity with its dual ancestry where it is the most scientific humanity of all. This is, in addition to being the most, humanist of all sciences. Based on the information it is crucial to visor that anthropology should stick to being human in that all information should be deduced through interpretation for utmost accuracy. This is, in addition to attempting to prove, or disapprove scientific laws by generating deeper interpretations of diverse cultural phenomena. On the other hand, based on Carneiro, scientific should be used to explain cultural phenomena based on facts and register to create logical and rational explanations. This is as proposed through cause-effect studies, as opposed to the mere interpretation of causes and effects. In addition, cultural anthropology focuses on analysis thus, to Carneiro it is a science, as opposed to the humanistic methods applied by interpretation. In this regard, the analysis g oes deeper into details in an attempt to capture more information than that which is found in humanist anthropology.